The Monday night under 8 training squad are playing from opening positions. The first position they are playing from is the Italian. Check out their first series of games.
It is important for all players to become great masters of tactics, to see all the threats that you and your opponent have on the board. To improve this ability, just like anything else, players need to have a training program. All players should be working through tactical puzzles every week and we are lucky that there are now sites online that can help us do this.
The Training Squad players must register on thechesstempo site and attempt at least 50 tactical puzzles each week. Their coaches can look at their performance, see which problems they are getting right or wrong and can set targets for them to achieve in the short term and the long term. If you want to be like the Training Squad players, then this is something that you should be doing.
Here's a quick tactic that Training Squad players should have no problems with.
It is important in all our games to examine forcing moves for both our self and our opponent. Here is a great game between 2 young stars from the Training Squad, Elijah Cordover and Harry Phillips. It was a very complicated game and there were lots of chances for both sides to take. The Elite class in Ormond are having to examine as many captures as possible in this game and work out which might be good and which not so good. That is the captures that happened and those that could have happened. Perhaps you'd like to join the Elite class in this exercise.
We have an amazingly talented group of very young players at chess kids who are currently in our under 8 squad which meets on a Monday at 5.15pm. For the past couple of weeks these kids have been working on tactics, and they're beginning to look at some more advanced ones such as "distractions". A distraction is where we get one of our opponent's pieces to move away from defending an important spot. In the first week we looked at distracting a king from protecting it's queen, while this week we looked at distracting pieces from protecting the back rank. The most famous distraction is in the following position.
How can white distract black from defending his back rank?
It's so exciting to be starting the second year of the Training Squad program. The first year was more successful than we could have hoped for and it's great to see many players returning for a second year, and some new faces too.
Whether old or new everyone has a responsibility to work to improve their own game. We coaches can give you some great advice, but if you guys aren't putting in the work, then all the good advice won't help you. New players should work really hard to catch up with those who have been in the Training Squad last year. Those players from last year should work hard to get even better results than they did last year, and there were some truly stunning performances in 2012.
So what work do you need to do?
1. You need to be regularly working on your tactics. Register at chesstempo.com and then send me your USERNAME and I can follow your progress and see your tactical strengths and weaknesses. Under 8's should be doing at least 30 of these puzzles each week. Everyone else should be doing at least 50 puzzles.
2. You need to be playing regularly. Everyone should be enrolled at the chesskids playing site and again send me your username so that I can follow your progress and see some of your games.
3. You should also be playing tournaments to try your play against stronger opposition. We have regular RJ Shield events throughout the year (the next one is Sunday 24th February and all Training Squad players should plan to play that), and Training Squad players should be playing as many as possible. Also, everyone should play at least one adult tournament throughout the year as well as state and national junior championships.
4. Collect and store your games at chessmicrobase and the games that you play should be recorded there. Then you can send me the games you play by pressing the "share" button and then "get link". If you copy this link and paste it into an email and send it to firstname.lastname@example.org then I will be able to look at your games and tell you what you are doing right and what things need to improve.
5. Keep regularly checking this blog, because there will be loads of info here for your benefit.
Thanks, and good to see you all again. Let's have an even better 2013!
The Training Squad that Chess Kids had worked on throughout the year was designed to see our kids play to the best of their abilities at the Australian Junior Championships. To assess whether this worked we would have to remember back to the start of 2012, and how good each of the kids were then, compared to how they did in the 2013 Championships. My own personal opinion is that our kids did unbelievably well, each of them playing to the best of their ability in the Championship, and that ability being considerably greater than it was 12 months previously.
The Championships was really split into 2 halves with the under 10's and 8's playing the first 3 days, while the under 10's, 12's and 14's played the final 5 days. The girls tournaments played alongside the older kids in the second half of the event, while there were also under 16 and 18 tournaments that covered all 9 days, though we had no players in these sections. So starting with the younger competitors, we had a number of players in both the under 10's and under 8's. The under 8's tournament was very competitive with Harry Phillips near the top all the way through the tournament. In fact Harry would have finished equal third if he hadn't played probably his worst game of the whole tournament in the last round. We can all learn from Harry's experience:
Don't let emotions get in the way of the game. If you start a game too excited, or unhappy, or tired then you will not perform at your best. It is important at a tournament to have some 'down time' where you leave chess behind and relax. When you play your game, you just want to be focussed on doing your best in the game, not thinking things like "where will I come in the tournament", this guy is rated too high for me to beat", or "how will this game affect my rating performance".
Harry Phillips still finished joint 4th in the event where he was joined by Oliver Cordover on 5/9. Just half a point back was Shawn Zillman on 4.5 and Elijah Cordover was another point back on 4 points. Scoring around 50% in these tournaments is a very good effort for these kids.
The under 10's was a very tough tournament with Kevin Willathgamuwa of New South Wales winning the event with a perfect 9/9, then going into the under 14's where he finished second! Still our players accredited themselves excellently. Michael Gershenzon finished in equal 4th just half a point outside the trophies. He was always among the top boards meaning that he was always playing strong players in the event, including the winner of the U12 tournament, Kerry Lin. We thought Michael's attitude was excellent, he never let defeats worry him, nor did he let victories go to his head. He just tried his hardest through every game. Daniel Poberezovsky also finished in the top half on 5/9, but he could have done even better had he started better. Ethan Hooi and Nithin Joshy both scored 4/9 which is respectable, and Oliver Pridmore scored 3, though he also could have done better but became disappointed after losing and didn't play his best chess.
I'll repeat, chess is a mental game, so you have to be in your best frame of mind to play your best chess.
Our competitors in the older age groups and the girls events played during the second half of the Championships. They had slightly more time to work on their game as they played 2 games per day, rather than the 3 games per day that the under 10's played. In the under 14's all our players performed well. Gary Lin played well and finished equal 3rd and had to play a very tough field. Ege Girgin would have finished equal fourth if he'd won his last game against Gary Lin. Ege played naturally and well with white, but struggled with black. A strategy dealing with this needs to be found, and Ege certainly wasn't the only player with this issue. Our other players in the under 14's all played well scoring around the half points mark, Liam Harrison 5 points, Sean Xiong 4.5 and Lachlan Martin 4.
The under 12's was possibly the toughest of all the divisions. Max Phillips raised his game to finish equal 5th, just half a point behind the 4 equal first place getters. Max played evenly throughout the tournament, and set himself a high goal which kept him motivated in every game. Each player in our group set themself a target score which could be adjusted if they were doing better or worse than expected. Setting a target that is hard to achieve, but not unrealistic is what we wanted and I think everyone in my group was within one point of their target if they didn't achieve it. Ryan Kam had to play Max in the final round and had he won, he would have finished in 5th and hit his target. As it was he lost finishing in =12th.
Ryan gets very nervous before tournaments, and feels very bad after losing game. These are natural emotions that need to be used to get the best performance. Everyone gets nerves before a tournament or a big game, but top players turn that into positive adrenalin and it makes them play at their strongest. After losing everyone feel bad, but those bad feelings must disappear before the next game or they will affect your performance. Analysing games, exercise, talking and laughing with friends and family are all things that can change your mood from sad to happy. Ryan still finished high up in the event and can be happy with his performance. Sam Trewin did well in his first major tournament, scoring half points. Again, he did better with white than black, and had a great attitude to his opponent's not fearing anyone but not taking anyone for granted either. Daniel Arzhintar only scored 2.5 but hasn't been a training squad member, had not prepared for the event and still scored more than was expected of him. Daniel also got down on himself when losing, so needs to find a strategy for improving this attitude.
Our girl players did very well, and with Victorian girls generally doing well, Chess Kids players will have a tough time proving themselves above their local rivals. Saying that, our girls have improved the most over the past year and it this continues they will overtake their opposition. Zoe Harrison came 2nd in the under 16 girls tournament. The under 16 girls were merged with the under 18, 14 and 12's. This meant that Zoe had to play a shorter time control than she was used to and to her credit, she just got on with. Rebecca Strickland came 2nd in the under 14 girls division scoring 5.5/9. Rebecca, like Harry Phillips, seemed to falter when she took the lead in the tournament, no doubt nerves and visions of glory got the better of her. Eliza Mapili came 3rd in the under 12 girls with 4.5 with Yuvini Perera just half a point behind her.
Sara Kam played in the under 10 girls finishing with 4.5/9, just half a point away from equal 3rd. Sara, like a number of young players doesn't think she is as good as she is. I think that a lot of players could perform better if they had more self belief. All of the Chess Kids players performed well and should go away from this tournament feeling confident in their ability to perform at the highest level of Australian Junior chess at their age groups.
Of course, to rise above the position you reached this time, and to become stronger than those who beat you, will take work.
All players from this tournament should:
1. Play as much quality chess as possible. Weekend tournaments, club chess, RJ Shields, interschool chess, online etc.
2. Work with a coach who can guide you to becoming a better player. This is much easier than doing this yourself.
3. Work on your weaknesses. For most this is, get a better black opening, work on your tactics, improve your endgame
skills, slow down (for the younger players), look at your opponents threats.
Chesskids players have now been present at a number of adult weekenders this year,
One thing I’ve noticed is that players who have a bad tournament seem to bounce back harder at the next event. Take for example Ryan Kam.
Ryan had a great tournament at the Victorian Juniors and has been awesome for his school at interschool tournaments all year. He went to the Best in the West tournament full of confidence and had a disappointing first day where he lost all his games, and one in tragic circumstances.
Ryan bounced back immediately, winning both his games on the second day, but he kept this momentum going into the Noble Park tournament where he beat 2 1400 players and drew with Gary Lin rated close to 1500. Ryan finished on 3.5 jointly winning the under 1300 rating group prize.
I would like to congratulate Ryan, but also caution him and all players in the Training Squad. When you’ve had a good result, you must not relax. All these tournaments are experience on the way to becoming great players and until you’ve gone as far as you can, perhaps become an IM or GM, then you should not be satisfied with what you’ve done.
Each new performance is a step towards the end, not the end of the road. So Ryan beat 1400 players, he now has to beat 1600 players, and be more consistent against 1000 rated players. Good work on what you’ve all achieved, but don’t relax, and you will achieve more!
Rebecca 3/7 Solid with good win against Jamie Yung (1357)
Lachlan 3/7 Solid with good win against Denise Lim (1214)
Haran 3/7 Solid with good win against Jamie Yung (1357)
Gary 2.5/7 ok
Max 2.5/7 ok
Benjamin 1/7 Good first performance in adult tournament with a win
Daniel 0/7 Relaxed a bit after decent Best in the West Performance
All the top players seem to have been influenced by a great player from the past. World Champion Karpov had a book of Capablanca's games, for example. That is probably why Karpov's style was based less on combinations, and more on positional play and great endgame ability. Karpov's great rival, Kasparov, has said he was greatly influenced by Alekhine, coincidentally Capablanca's great rival. And it is obvious that Kasparov's great combinational ability reflects that of the player he admired, Alekhine.
Alekhine produced lots of amazing tactical attacking games but he was also a master of endgame play, and positional understanding. For Alekhine, the attack needed to come from the position and if he sacrificed it was his ability in assessing how much compensation he would get that usually made these work. Alekhine is a great player to study if you are an attacking player yourself. If you have trouble with attacks or advanced tactics and combination, then Alekhine is also good to study as you will definitely learn from his games and ideas.
There are some attacks by Alekhine now for members of the Training Squad to look at, but take a look at this combination and see if you can work out what Alekhine as black played?
Term 2 of the training squad has started and the main topics have been endgame training, specialising so far in endgames where both sides only have kings and pawns. These are important as they can be reached from all other endings so it is important to know when you can exchange down to pawn endgames and when you can't.
We've also been looking at some opening schemes, and all students are being encouraged to expand their opening attempts. This is because if you keep playing the same openings you will not develop enough new ideas, and won't understand as many different positions as those that do try new things out.
Finally, we have a new database program that all students (and even non students can use) called chess microbase. It is an online site where you can store your gam
We had our first Run Down on Sunday and while only a small group were able to attend the games were very exciting.
We split into 4 teams for the day and "Chess Master" (captained by William Maligin) were victorious. Full results and games on Tornelo.
Carl Gorka is the coach of the VIC Training Squad. All squad members should be reading Carl's comments, tips and advice after each weekly squad meet.